“Intellectual Property Rights: Understanding and Protecting Your Creations
TRADEMARKS Proceeding Procedure, And The Time Frame After filing the application, the registry issues an official receipt with the filing date and application number. The application is then formally examined for registrability and official examination…
Upon meeting the qualification for registration against objections raised by an examiner, a Trademark is published in the Trademarks Journal to enable any third party oppose the registration within a…
Patents 1. Proceeding Procedure, and the Time Frame After filing the application, the Patent Office issues an official receipt with the filing date and application number. The application is published…
KAnalysis helps its client to secure Patent for US Application No. 14/748,533, directly without any office action from the USPTO. The invention was meticulously searched for prior-art and drafting was…
KAnalysis Consultant (P) Ltd., an Intellectual Property Boutique assists its Hair Illusion LLC to successfully oppose the wrongful application by Bradley Hunter to secure a Trademark for Hair Illusion in…
KAnalysis has been able to register a Trademark for “#1” on behalf of their client “FANG, Grace”, with Notice of Allowance on April 18, 2017. USPTO has entitled the mark…
Summary of new changes introduced in the Trademark Rules 2017
Two categories of applicant
Applicants are categorised into two categories and separate fee schedule is prescribed for both the categories i) Individual/Startup/Small Enterprise; ii) Others (more…)
The Trade Mark Rules, 2017 have been notified and come into effect from 06th March, 2017. New Rules replaced the former Rules prescribed under the Trade Mark Rules 2002. New Rules are introduced with the objective to simplify the registration process in India. Some notable changes presented under the new Rules are : (more…)
KAnalysis has been able to register a Trademark for "APTASK" on behalf of their client "APTASK LLC", with Publication of Opposition on November 15, 2016. The examiner had questioned regarding…